바로가기 메뉴
본문내용 바로가기
하단내용 바로가기

메뉴보기

메뉴보기

발표연제 검색

연제번호 : P 3-53 북마크
제목 Severity of Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction and its Management in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury
소속 Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine1, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine2
저자 So Jung Kim1*, Ju Hyun Son1, So Jung Lee1, Sungchul Huh1, Hyun-Yoon Ko1,2†
Introduction
Bowel dysfunction is a significant consequence of spinal cord injury (SCI), leading to fecal incontinence and constipation. Bowel management and its associated problems have increasingly been considered as important factors for community reintegration and quality of life after injury. The purpose of the study is to describe the severity of neurogenic bowel dysfunction and its management in patients with SCI.

Methods
The questionnaire consisted of two sections, neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) score of Krogh et al. and bowel management proposed by Coggrave et al. The survey was conducted inpatient and outpatient with SCI. A correlation between severity, satisfaction, and limitation of daily life was analyzed using a chi-square test.

Results
A total of 38 subjects of SCI were enrolled. Table 1 showed the clinical characteristics of the subjects (30 men, 8 women, mean age 54 ± 15.7 years). The distribution of neurological level of injury in patients was as follows: C-level 17 (44.7%), T-level 13 (34.2%), and L-level 8 (21.1%). A complete injury was 14 (36.9%). The NBD score was 12.84 ± 7.83 in all subjects, and the severity score was 8 (21%) in very minor, 7 (18.4%) in minor, 9 (23.7%) in moderate, and 14 (36.9%). The reported interventions for bowel management are shown in Figure 1. Many responders said more than one intervention was performed. Suppositories were used in 52.6% and they often used in combination with abdominal massage or manual evacuation. The reported problems associated with bowel care are shown in Figure 2. The priority of problems related to bowel care was constipation (17%) and the second priority was abdominal distension (15%). Fifty percent of respondents were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. Table 2 showed the effect of bowel management on daily activities. More than 60% of respondents said they had limitations in their daily life. In order to examine the effect of severity and satisfaction on daily activities, we evaluated the correlation between severity, satisfaction, and limitation of daily life (Table 3). There was no significant correlation between satisfaction and severity (p = 0.14). The level of satisfaction was related to the part of the “It's a problem” (p = 0.04) and the “Prevents staying away from home” (p=0.01) in daily life, but the severity was not correlated with the limitation of daily life.

Conclusion
For effective bowel management and quality of life improvement in patients with SCI, the management status and main problem of the SCI population must be better known and taken into account. This will provide basic data for the development of rehabilitation programs that can positively affect the bowel management and quality of life in individuals with SCI.
Fig 1 Interventions used for bowel care (multiple responses possible) Fig 2. Reported problem associated bowel care
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the subjects, n=38
Tab 2 Reported effect of bowel management on life activity Tab 3. Satisfaction and NBD severity related life activity