바로가기 메뉴
본문내용 바로가기
하단내용 바로가기

메뉴보기

메뉴보기

발표연제 검색

연제번호 : OP3-2-9 북마크
제목 Sonographic evaluation of optimal needle insertion site of biceps femoris short head
소속 Korea University Ansan Hospital, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine1
저자 Se Young Shin1*, Dong Hwee Kim1†, Ki Hoon Kim1
Purpose: To assess the optimal needle placement site for the electromyographic examination of the biceps femoris short head muscle through sonographic evaluation

Participants: Thirty-six lower limbs of 18 voluntary healthy people

Methods: The study was designed as a prospective cross-sectional study. The distance was measured using ultrasonography from medial and lateral margin of BFL tendon to CPN (M_BFLT_CPN, L_BFLT_CPN distance), and hazard window from medial and lateral margin of BFL tendon to CPN (M_CPN_angle1&2, L_CPN_angle1&2) at 5cm proximal to the tip of fibular head (P1), 7cm proximal (about 4 finger breadths) to the tip of fibular head (P2).

Results: Median results of medial BFL tendon margin to CPN distances (M_BFLT_CPN) were 7.33mm (2.10mm – 16.18mm) at P1, 11.58mm (7.16mm - 22.39mm) at P2 level. Median results of lateral BFL tendon margin to CPN distances (L_BFLT_CPN) were 19.97mm (11.96mm – 26.22mm) at P1, 22.05mm (14.31mm – 29.81mm) at P2 level. Median results of angle between medial BFL tendon margin to CPN borders were 23.53˚ to 52.28˚ at P1 level, and 18.18˚ to 35.06˚ at P2 level. Median results of angle between lateral BFL tendon margin to CPN borders were 75.12˚ to 83.00˚ at P1 level, and 37.24˚ to 74.60˚ at P2 level. The CPN courses in proximity to the medial margin of the BFL tendon and locates nearly direct below the BFL tendon.

Conclusions: A medial approach of the needle electrode for electromyographic examination of the biceps femoris short head would have a high risk of injury to the CPN. Considering the anatomical positioning between CPN and biceps femoris short head muscle, the lateral approach is strongly recommended for electromyographic examination of this muscle.
File.1: table 1.GIF
BFLT_1: BFL tendon short distance, BFLT_2: BFL tendon long distance, BFS_2: BFL tendon long distance, BFS_1: BFS muscle short distance, BFS_2: BFS muscle long distance, M_BFS_S: direct distance of skin to BFL tendon medial border, M_BFS_D: direct distance of skin to BFS muscle deepest margin at medial border of BFL tendon point, M_BFS thickness: M_BFS_D-M_BFS_S, M_BFS_HL: direct distance of M_BFS_D line to medial border of BFS muscle, L_BFS_S: direct distance of skin to BFL tendon lateral border, L_BFS_D: direct distance of skin to BFS muscle deepest margin at lateral border of BFL tendon point, L_BFS thickness: L_BFS_D-L_BFS_S, L_BFS_HL: direct distance of L_BFS_D line to lateral border of BFS muscle, * P-value < 0.05; Wilcoxon singed-rank test compared between P1 and P2
File.2: table 2.GIF
BFS_S: direct distance of skin to each BFL tendon border, BFS_D: direct distance of skin to BFS muscle deepest margin at each border of BFL tendon point, BFS thckness: BFS_D – BFS_S, BFS_HL: direct distance of BFS_D line to each border of BFS muscle, BFLT_CPN: each BFL tendon margin to CPN distance, CPN_angle1: angle of medial border of CPN between each BFL tendon margin, CPN_angle2: angle of lateral border of CPN between each BFL tendon margin, *P-value < 0.05; Wilcoxon singed-rank test compared between lateral and medial
File.3: figure 1.GIF
Figure 1. Ultrasonographic image and measurement parameters at P1 level